openai anthropic development codex claude-code tools

OpenAI Codex App: The response to Claude Code's $1B success

OpenAI launches Codex App to compete with Anthropic's Claude Code. We compare features, pricing, and use cases of the two most powerful AI coding tools of 2026.

N
Nextsoft
4 min read

OpenAI officially launched Codex App, their direct response to Claude Code’s massive success. With one million monthly active developers since its December launch, OpenAI aims to regain ground in the AI coding market that Anthropic dominates.

The context: Claude Code’s success

Claude Code became a phenomenon in 2025:

MetricClaude Code
Annualized revenue$1 billion
Time to $1B6 months
Enterprise usersThousands of companies
Main useFull-stack development

For context, ChatGPT took 2 years to reach that figure.

OpenAI Codex App: Main features

Multiple simultaneous agents

The star feature: managing multiple AI agents in parallel for long projects:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                CODEX APP - MULTI-AGENT                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                              │
│   Project: E-commerce Migration                             │
│                                                              │
│   Agent 1 (Backend)     Agent 2 (Frontend)     Agent 3     │
│   ┌─────────────────┐  ┌─────────────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│   │ Migrating APIs  │  │ Updating React  │  │ Writing   │  │
│   │ from REST to    │  │ components      │  │ E2E tests │  │
│   │ GraphQL         │  │                 │  │           │  │
│   │ [████████░░]    │  │ [██████░░░░]    │  │ [████░░░░░]│  │
│   │ 80%             │  │ 60%             │  │ 40%        │  │
│   └─────────────────┘  └─────────────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│   Total: 3 active agents | Estimated time: 2h 15m          │
│                                                              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Persistent project context

Unlike traditional chat, Codex App:

  • Maintains complete project context
  • Remembers architectural decisions
  • Understands dependencies between files
  • Tracks changes and can revert

OpenAI ecosystem integration

FeatureAvailability
GPT-5.2 CodexGeneration backend
ChatGPT PlusIntegrated
API accessAvailable
GitHub CopilotComplementary

Comparison: Codex App vs Claude Code

Features

FeatureCodex AppClaude Code
Multi-agentYes, nativeLimited
CLIDesktop appCLI + Desktop
Context window128K tokens200K tokens
Autonomous modeYesYes (excellent)
Git integrationYesYes
RefactoringGoodExcellent
DebuggingVery goodExcellent

Pricing (estimated)

PlanCodex AppClaude Code
Free50 requests/day20 requests/day
Pro$25/month$20/month
Team$30/user/month$25/user/month
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Languages and frameworks

Both support major ones, but with differences:

Codex App better at:

  • Python (ML/AI)
  • JavaScript/TypeScript
  • Azure integration

Claude Code better at:

  • Multi-language projects
  • Large codebases (200K+ lines)
  • Complex refactoring

Use cases: When to use each

Use Codex App if:

  1. Working with multiple parallel tasks - Multi-agent system is superior
  2. Your stack is mainly Python/JS - Better optimized
  3. Already using OpenAI/Azure - Native integration
  4. Want graphical UI - Desktop app is polished

Use Claude Code if:

  1. Very large codebases - Better context window
  2. Need deep refactoring - Superior in structural changes
  3. Legacy projects - Better understanding of old code
  4. Prefer CLI - Smoother experience

In our practice, we use both:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                  HYBRID WORKFLOW                             │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                              │
│   1. Planning and architecture                              │
│      → Claude Code (better reasoning)                       │
│                                                              │
│   2. Parallel feature development                           │
│      → Codex App (multi-agent)                              │
│                                                              │
│   3. Refactoring and cleanup                                │
│      → Claude Code (more precise)                           │
│                                                              │
│   4. Testing and debugging                                  │
│      → Both work well                                       │
│                                                              │
│   5. Documentation                                          │
│      → ChatGPT/Claude (not coding tools)                    │
│                                                              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The AI Coding market in 2026

ToolEstimated usersStrength
GitHub Copilot15M+Inline completions
Claude Code5M+Autonomous development
Cursor3M+IDE integration
Codex App1M+ (growing)Multi-agent
Devin100K+Full autonomy

What’s next

Q1 2026

  • Codex App: Multi-agent improvements
  • Claude Code: Claude Sonnet 5 integration
  • GitHub Copilot: Workspace improvements

Q2 2026

  • Market consolidation
  • Possible acquisitions
  • More competitive pricing

Conclusion

Competition between OpenAI and Anthropic in AI coding is excellent for developers:

  • Better tools
  • More competitive pricing
  • More innovation

We recommend trying both tools and choosing based on your workflow. Most teams will end up using both for different tasks.


Need help implementing AI in your development workflow? Contact us for a free consultation on AI coding tools.

Related Terms

Learn more about these concepts in our glossary:

View all terms →
Share article:
💬

Have a project in mind?

Let's talk about how we can help you achieve your technology goals.

Schedule a free consultation